By: Tyler Norton
After experiencing the 2012 Venice Biennale,
there is no question in my mind that the job of the architect is evolving. The
entire basis of the Biennale is to showcase innovative architecture from around
the world and it only took walking through the first few exhibits to show that
this year’s festival was no exception to the rule. One theme that I repeatedly
noticed throughout many exhibits was a sort of rejuvenation of architecture.
Many of the exhibits and pavilions were not about completely new designs, but
more about redesigning what already exists in a new, creative, and highly
innovative fashion. This brings up the question of how, exactly architecture is
evolving and more importantly, how particular exhibits in the Biennale chose to
represent this new age of architects.
With
the world population topping off at roughly 7 billion people, it is no wonder
that cities are growing larger and larger, and more and more spread out.
Eventually, we may even come to a point where we run out of space entirely. We
may not be quite at that stage yet, but there is no denying that, while there
are obviously still plenty of new designs being built, architects are focusing
less on creating new buildings, and more on modifying existing ones. In my
opinion, the higher the population grows, and the more the earth and cityscapes
around us change, the more the job of the architect changes. Today’s architect
has to deal with a whole new set of challenges such as rejuvenating existing
spaces, all the while creating a delicate yet drastic balance of keeping touch
with the past and remaining faithfully innovative in the design process. There
are a few exhibits that I think did a beautiful job of illustrating this
progression in the field of architecture.
The
first exhibit that sticks out to me that applies to this theme of rejuvenation
is the Ruta del Peregrino exhibit, which focused on the pilgrimage of Mexican
residents to the temple of the Virgin of Talpa. This long and excruciating
journey has very poor conditions and very little shelter for the pilgrims to
stay in along the way. This project dealt with new design, but in the sense
that they took this very old tradition, reevaluated the conditions, and created
new buildings that sheltered the journeyers. Another example deals with the
reuse of existing buildings and that is the German Pavilion. Architects in
Germany are particularly close to facing the challenge of modifying buildings
because the existing and sometimes hastily built postwar buildings are no
longer suitable for their way of life. Therefore, they are using the theme of
“Reduce/Reuse/Recycle” not only applying to reusing buildings but also tying in
sustainable and recyclable materials that make the modifications innovative. While
the German exhibit was about reusing, the Japanese Pavilion instead focused on
complete reconstruction of buildings that were damaged by the recent and
devastating tsunamis. A personal favorite exhibit of mine is the Norman Foster
exhibit, which was the ‘gateway’ exhibit. The overall message behind this
exhibit focuses on a general regrouping of architecture all over the world.
Next, the Zaha Hadid exhibit focused not only on her recent works, but also
mainly on her reinterpretation of the engineer Frei Otto’s work. Finally, in
the Dutch exhibit, called “Reset,” there were a series of curtains that were
rearranged every 5 to 10 minutes to represent fluid and flexible spaces that
can easily be rearranged, which alludes to existing buildings that have the
potential to be transformed into something completely new.
Although
they do so in different ways, each of these exhibits show how existing architecture
can be revitalized, refreshed, restored, and re-energized to turn out
completely new. After seeing all of these exhibits, it is very clear to me that
architecture has evolved from just simple design, to a much harder, and
ultimately more rewarding field: that of redesign.
No comments:
Post a Comment