by Fielding Lowrance
My experience in Venice at the
Biennale was one of the most enriching experiences I had while on my ten day
extended travel around the north of Italy. The first portion that we visited, which
included expositions that related specifically to architecture, was
particularly interesting. We had only a
very short period of time in which to take in a very large number of
expositions, a fact that I found rather overwhelming and which led to a bit of
a sensory overload. However, I still came away with some observations that have
enhanced, and in some cases changed the way in which I think about
architecture.
The
exhibition that had the greatest impact on me personally was certainly not the
most sensational. However, the simplicity of the nature in which the idea
behind the exhibit was conveyed lent power to the idea itself. The exhibit was
one of the first that we viewed and was simply a darkened room with black and
white images and text projected on each of the walls. The black and white,
highly contrasted images immediately called attention to the architectural
forms that they depicted. The fact that the framing of the images often took
the subject out of the context of the entire building heightened the affect. There
was written underneath each image the name of the building, and a description
of the form: regulated, wavy, geometric, etc. A slide with text explained the
difference between affect and meaning of form. While meaning is specific to the
individual and dependent upon that individual’s biases, affect is the influence
that the form has and has a closer relation to the form itself.
This idea colored many of the
observations that I made later that day, and even influenced some of my previous
experiences upon reflection. For example, in one of the later exhibits
participants were asked to vote on what emotions certain buildings made them
feel. The results were displayed on panels located throughout the room. Some
buildings generally evoked similar responses. For example a rigid looking
concrete government building elicited primarily anger and very few feelings of
freedom. However, the responses to some buildings varied, or had votes split
between similar responses such as happy and free. This reiterated the idea that
the same forms can carry different meanings for different individuals.
The theme of the relationship between
architecture and the people who populate was also present in many of the other
exhibits I viewed that day. One that comes to mind in particular was another
room that made heavy use of projectors. However, this room, presented full
color images on all for walls, depicting large groups of people in states that
varied from peaceful to highly agitated/protesting. On the floor cities were
depicted coming together and dispersing in time with the images on the walls.
This illustrated the role that populations play in the construction and
destruction of a city environment and the cyclical nature of these
developments.
No comments:
Post a Comment